To diigo or not to diigo – a del.icio.us dilemma


I had posted on my online bookmarking dilemma a couple of months back, and had decided to try out two services – diigo and del.icio.us – based on a basic evaluation of different bookmarking services. I tried out both services for about a month and a half in parallel, by using the diigo extension for Firefox to post simultaneously to diigo and del.icio.us. Last month I switched over to the del.icio.us extension for Firefox to post solely to del.icio.us, and I have continued with this primarily due to its better Firefox extension.

Following is a run down of my observations during the trial run with the two services:

Firefox extensions

I found the del.icio.us extension more handy to use with its suggested tags (your own plus from other users when available) for the bookmarks. The diigo extension on the other hand only had tag auto-completion from the list of tags already used, with no suggestions from tags used by others (it did show other users’ comments when available). Also, the del.icio.us extension provides a button to bookmark the page (something built into the browser Flock by the way) while diigo requires you to either use its toolbar which results in loss of screen real estate (similar to the StumbleUpon toolbar) or right click on the page and choose the bookmark option from the menu (also provided by the del.icio.us extension).

In addition to the ease of bookmarking, the del.icio.us extension also provides a sidebar to search through your bookmarks without having to visit the site.

Website experience

Currently, the diigo site is easily better than the del.icio.us site which has not undergone much of a change in recent times. diigo provides a much better interface. Also, the del.icio.us site is quite slow.

diigo bookmarks

That said, this is due to change soon with both services running private betas for their new sites. Unfortunately I haven’t gotten an invite to either site though I put myself on the waiting list almost 3 months back. However, from what I’ve seen online, the new del.icio.us site looks similar to what is currently available on diigo. See if you have better luck getting into the beta sites:

diigo beta

del.icio.us beta (TechCrunch coverage including screenshots)

Truth be told, I have not had to visit the website of either service much other than to bulk organize some bookmarks and make some setting changes.

Special features

diigo has a much larger feature set than del.icio.us, like text highlighting, posting to other bookmarking sites (something I used throughout to keep in sync with del.icio.us), page caching (this seems to the USP for some users if you look at the TechCrunch post comments on the del.icio.us preview) etc. However, on last try, some features like posting bookmark list to a blog (I discovered that diigo was running on Rails due to the error pages I saw when trying to access this feature), seemed to be buggy. I gave up on the post to blog feature on diigo and switched to del.icio.us which seems to work quite well (though the site leaves much to be desired – the password is in plain text).

Final thoughts (at least till the previews are released)

del.icio.us seems to be serving my online bookmarking requirements quite well (too well if you look at my daily bookmark posts) for the time being. diigo has its uses especially if you are collecting bookmarks for some kind of research – the highlighting can be very useful for annotations (you can also see others’ highlighting if present) and the page cache (available but done manually) should ensure that the page is still available in some form even if the source goes down.

I’ll probably give both services another parallel trial run once the previews are released. And the fact that the import/export feature on both services is quite good, switching back and forth between them shouldn’t be much of a pain (though repeatedly typing “del.icio.us” like I did in this post is).

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “To diigo or not to diigo – a del.icio.us dilemma

  1. I think Diigo and delicious are 2 distinct products with bookmarking in common. Diigo is essentially a research tool that lets you do lots of great stuff like annotating and keeping notes where asDelicious is plain bookmarking and discovery website (with lots of fan following). Diigo has a great toolbar that can integrate your diigo account with lots of other players including delicious. I am surprised that delicious never introduced a toolbar (just a sidebar) or provided any way to take notes (there is a feature of comments though). I like Diigo and i am very happy with the collection type service. Sharing is easy by forwarding a particular page with your notes.

  2. @techmine I agree that diigo & delicious have there differences, with diigo being more of delicious++. I would definitely turn to diigo when collecting data from different sites, while for general bookmarking delicious is quite adequate.

  3. Like Techmine brought up – you can use Diigo as your primary bookmarking tool and then have it pass the details to bookmark in Del.icio.us as well. I’d prefer to use Diigo only but use this approach for a couple of reasons:

    1) Sites (i.e. Facebook and Plaxo) have widgets for Del.icio.us but not Diigo.
    2) It’s a backup for the bookmarks in the event Diigo does not catch on.

    On the second note, I’m really shocked that Diigo is not more popular. It does not get the love in the social bookmarklets integrated into a good deal of blogs now…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s