To diigo or not to diigo – a dilemma

I had posted on my online bookmarking dilemma a couple of months back, and had decided to try out two services – diigo and – based on a basic evaluation of different bookmarking services. I tried out both services for about a month and a half in parallel, by using the diigo extension for Firefox to post simultaneously to diigo and Last month I switched over to the extension for Firefox to post solely to, and I have continued with this primarily due to its better Firefox extension.

Following is a run down of my observations during the trial run with the two services:

Firefox extensions

I found the extension more handy to use with its suggested tags (your own plus from other users when available) for the bookmarks. The diigo extension on the other hand only had tag auto-completion from the list of tags already used, with no suggestions from tags used by others (it did show other users’ comments when available). Also, the extension provides a button to bookmark the page (something built into the browser Flock by the way) while diigo requires you to either use its toolbar which results in loss of screen real estate (similar to the StumbleUpon toolbar) or right click on the page and choose the bookmark option from the menu (also provided by the extension).

In addition to the ease of bookmarking, the extension also provides a sidebar to search through your bookmarks without having to visit the site.

Website experience

Currently, the diigo site is easily better than the site which has not undergone much of a change in recent times. diigo provides a much better interface. Also, the site is quite slow.

diigo bookmarks

That said, this is due to change soon with both services running private betas for their new sites. Unfortunately I haven’t gotten an invite to either site though I put myself on the waiting list almost 3 months back. However, from what I’ve seen online, the new site looks similar to what is currently available on diigo. See if you have better luck getting into the beta sites:

diigo beta beta (TechCrunch coverage including screenshots)

Truth be told, I have not had to visit the website of either service much other than to bulk organize some bookmarks and make some setting changes.

Special features

diigo has a much larger feature set than, like text highlighting, posting to other bookmarking sites (something I used throughout to keep in sync with, page caching (this seems to the USP for some users if you look at the TechCrunch post comments on the preview) etc. However, on last try, some features like posting bookmark list to a blog (I discovered that diigo was running on Rails due to the error pages I saw when trying to access this feature), seemed to be buggy. I gave up on the post to blog feature on diigo and switched to which seems to work quite well (though the site leaves much to be desired – the password is in plain text).

Final thoughts (at least till the previews are released) seems to be serving my online bookmarking requirements quite well (too well if you look at my daily bookmark posts) for the time being. diigo has its uses especially if you are collecting bookmarks for some kind of research – the highlighting can be very useful for annotations (you can also see others’ highlighting if present) and the page cache (available but done manually) should ensure that the page is still available in some form even if the source goes down.

I’ll probably give both services another parallel trial run once the previews are released. And the fact that the import/export feature on both services is quite good, switching back and forth between them shouldn’t be much of a pain (though repeatedly typing “” like I did in this post is).

links for 2007-12-10